Denouement

November 27, 2011

211. IN THE LANGUAGE of contradiction, the critique of culture manifests itself as unified: unified in that it dominates the whole of culture — culture as knowledge as well as culture as poetry; unified, too, in that it is no longer separable from the critique of the social totality. It is this unified theoretical critique that goes alone to its rendezvous with a unified social practice.

Occupiers Evicted From the New School; Graffiti Is Left Behind
November 26, 2011, 3:49 PM
via nytimes

A weeklong occupation at the New School in Greenwich Village ended with a whimper on Friday morning when university officials evicted the handful of remaining protesters from a campus gallery that was defaced sometime before they left.

But the events leading up to that point were uncertain, as some of those who had participated in the occupation said they did not know who the evicted demonstrators were or why slogans were scrawled on the walls of the ground-floor gallery. (One read, “Spoiled New School Anarchists.”)

“I don’t understand how people could’ve painted that and no one notice,” said Chris Crews, a graduate student at the New School who participated in the protest. “It’s unclear how they even got there.”

Senior administrators, including the university’s president, David E. Van Zandt, entered the gallery about 9:30 in the morning. They found it covered with graffiti. They also found about five people, some of whom were sleeping. When none of them produced identification, school or otherwise, they were asked to leave, a New School spokesman said.

Most of the people looked like they were more than 30 years old, said a university spokesman, Peter Taback, who accompanied Dr. Van Zandt.

The New School demonstration started at the university’s student study center on the second floor of 90 Fifth Avenue, at the corner of 14th Street, to protest the escalating costs of higher education. But the school leases the space, and the landlord, a company controlled by the real estate developer Aby Rosen, wanted the protesters out of the building.

Dr. Van Zandt — who was chosen last year as the successor to Bob Kerrey, a former senator from Nebraska and presidential candidate — had offered the nearby gallery, at 2 West 13th Street, as an alternative location, but on the conditions that the protesters not sleep there or scrawl graffiti on the walls, as had been done in the other space. He said, however, that the gallery, which was not displaying any art, would be open 24 hours a day.

Dr. Van Zandt’s offer was a controversial proposition within the New School protest, which began on Nov. 17 with about 100 participants after a rally in Union Square and was an offshoot of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Protesters and their supporters met in the study center Tuesday evening and voted to move to the new space. Some made their way to the gallery on West 13th Street throughout the week, with their numbers fluctuating by the day, but did not spend nights there. A small group of hard-line protesters, however, refused to leave the original space, on Fifth Avenue.

“To occupy a space that was given to us is antithetical to what many of us believe in,” said Ian McKenzie, who identified himself as a student at Pratt Institute and was one of the final demonstrators at the study center.

About these ads

3 Responses to “Denouement”

  1. Mark Elliot Cullen Says:

    You know, if you talked about student issues in clear language you’d have greater success communicating with the student body.

    Attempting to say something interesting with the theoretical language of the situationists or Hegel misses the point entirely. You should use that theory to guide your actions, but its a very inefficient way to get any message across. That language was not written for a general audience and serves no purpose in this context other than to highlight how “serious” you are.

    The obscurity in these theoretical texts is usually the result of translation or writers whose first language is not english. It’s hilarious to see mimicry of early Zizek in the language of the book cover intellectuals running some of the occupy communications. The value of good theory is in the ideas, not in the frustratingly transgressive language.

    Remember your audience.

  2. Veuphorik Says:

    This occupation was disruptive, disgraceful, and very very very disrespectful. These abrasive oafs showed an unprecedented level of ignorance throughout the course of this occupation by destroying what was once property of honorable, proud students who paid for and earned their right to the spaces mentioned. Instead of gathering the minds for a basic discourse on politics or the movement itself, they simply gathered to DESTROY the perfectly good spaces GIVEN to them in an extremely gracious and hospitable manner.
    These vagrants should not be proud of what they’ve done but rather deeply ashamed as their own mothers and all reasonably logical members of this planet undeniably are.


  3. [...] texts from the occupation: Denouement Attack Us if You Dare Message from [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers

%d bloggers like this: